Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:43:29 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Gene Ash
>Comments like poorly managed and mite and virus riddled are almost always SPECULATIVE comments (and often time not much more than gossip).
I agree these are sometimes speculative, but not in this instance. We've been monitoring 50+ colonies for treatment regime, mite levels, virus load and overwinter survival managed by amateur beekeepers. Some colonies had mite counts of 5,000 - 15,000 and DWV levels were of the order of 10^10 genome equivalents per bee. Winter losses were commensurate with this at ~55%.
Whilst we might not be smart enough to tell people exactly how to manage their bees, the principles are well-established - good observation, intervention when appropriate using a treatment in the approved manner.
It's interesting that there are regulations in place for the management of a variety of livestock, but generally not for bees (when these are often considered livestock). The livestock regulations are there to protect the livestock - where you could consider preventing undue suffering is an ethical issue - and to prevent disease transmission to other species (including sometimes to humans).
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|