Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:25:52 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sorry Mike,
When a study measures a independent variable, such as number of bees
returning with pollen loads, against a putative dependent variable, such as
amount of wax produced, a scatterplot graph will suggest a correlation if
the data points roughly line up along a slope. The R squared value
indicates what percentage of the variation in the dependent variable
appears to correlate with the independent variable.
In English, an R squared value of 1 indicates 100% correlation. In the
study we are referring to, the R squared value was 0.77, which would be
considered to be indicative of a strong correlation between incoming pollen
and wax production. The question then is whether the pollen income was
causal--meaning, was the amount of wax produced actually due to the pollen
coming in, or was it a spurious correlation, since the amount of incoming
pollen may simply indicate that a lot of nectar was also being brought it?
I'd welcome anyone else to take a stab at explaining R squared values : )
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|