Mime-Version: |
1.0 (1.0) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:58:25 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I believe the treatment-free folks claims, and I am not saying anyone is a liar, but for their success to be scientifically relevant, it must be replicated by other researchers. Repeatedly. Replication is crucial.
Proper measurements, well-documented procedures, clearly defined terms and goals are all valuable for other people trying to replicate the experiment. And when/if a result is surprising, that careful documentation can offer clues as to why someone got the unexpected results.
So while I am happy for those who succeed without treatment, (and wish that I had that success) it isn’t useful to others without clear documentation of what was done to achieve those results.
Sent from my iPhone
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|