Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:02:03 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Speaking of "organic beekeeping" --
>
>
> Comment: They got this right: there are "beekeepers that are willing to
> use any product on the market" -- legally approved or otherwise. Also, what
> does "non-bee derived products" include? Nothing, I suppose, but honey,
> pollen, and propolis. Sounds like a resurgence of the "bee-havers." It
> isn't beekeeping to let your bees die of disease when there are economical
> safe solutions.
>
>
> Right On!
Happening every where and then those who buy, well as the expression goes
, There's a sucker born every day
Further
got an email from one of my pregnant customers.
the question was since she was pregnant and honey contains the botulism
bacteria,
someone told her /or she read it on the web that it would affect the fetus.
I'll tell you that I very carefully worded the reply .
Will in my next post share the reply from the folks that I initially
referred to.
Walter
littlewolfapiaries.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|