BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Feb 2018 01:28:39 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: honeybees as agriculture
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
 



> Thanks for the speculative explantions : )
> Here's the actual data--attached.  Took a while to download and transfer,
> but it didn't appear to be about either weather, wax, nor bee boys.
>

        looking at Randys data we are looking at it wrong and asking the wrong question,  the question should not be whats the decline,  but what was the rise?  even at current lows we are above the "historical heyday" of honey production.   what caused the jump from 50 to 80 is the real question!Charles
   

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2