BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:18:49 -0800
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Tim Hiatt <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Congrats, Paul!

Commercial beekeeper here, we lost our usual 1/3, after having bought some
loads of bees in late summer to make up for early losses. If not for that
losses would have been higher. We treat with amitraz mostly with thymol
occasionally. For me, that 1/3 is the fraction lost between the peak hive
number during summer honey production and the bottom number going into
almond pollination after wintering. I'm not sure how everyone measures
their annual loss.

I spoke to another large beekeeper in WA who lost 50% before winter. They
said that was unusually high for them.

Tim
eastern WA

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2