BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kristina Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Feb 2017 20:41:40 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Dan Wright <[log in to unmask]>

> Because you are averaging 3 days vs 9 days?
> A higher mite fall in the first 3 days after treatment is washed out in the
> math by a lower mite fall the last 3, 4, 5, 6 days of treatment...

I think what Dan is getting at is that you might have gotten 300 mites
falling on the first day and then 2 mites a day for the next 8.  That first
blast is lost in the averaging process.  Still it's not great, but then
that's no surprise for Apistan or Hopguard.  Apivar?  Nothing good lasts
forever.
Cheers,
Kristina Williams
Boulder, CO

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2