BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:36:52 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Queen Effeciency
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<000801d4356a$e4178860$ac469920$@com>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Mike S <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
>>>   compare the money spent on requeening and the actual return, versus -- say -- the same money invested in queen    >>>  Add to that the 21 day MIN downtime       <><><>    If one were to use a double screen Snellgrove board then one could raise a new queen above the old colony and not loose the lowering production of the old, failing queen.  When the new queen starts laying, join the two colonies.
Mike in LA

 
  

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2