BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:35:00 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Eugene Makovec <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
"what I found interesting was they found neonics in the bee bread, but an
article in beeculture two months ago about the same subject said they found
none in the pollen, and that they didn't test the nectar and maybe if they
did they would have found some there. "

"I don't know what article in Bee Culture you are referring to?  It would
help to know that so that we can compare the two works."

It's a March 2017 Bee Culture article by Kristen Traynor, Dennis
vanEnglesdorp et al.

Eugene Makovec

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2