BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 May 2017 08:03:11 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
a ET Ash said a lot

In my post II noted that numbers are on the side of commercial beekeepers
but, and it is a big butt, they are concentrated while hobby BKs are
dispersed. hence the hobby BK has much more impact on other beekeepers than
does the commercial beekeeper. So commercial beekeepers, no matter how
inept, have a lesser impact spreading Varroa bombs. Occam's razor as an
alternative fact.

As far as Varroa bombs being a "shield for why their research programs have
not 'solved' the issue" the study of bees from dead hives showing up all
around the neighbourhood seems to validate it but even more, Occam's razor
also is at play. Hence it fits the facts so is a third alternative fact.

At this point I vision heads exploding throughout the land.

Mission accomplished.

a Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2