BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Fri, 12 May 2017 15:46:21 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>Odd that no one has yet mentioned that every lost swarm later becomes a
varroa bomb when it collapses.

I've tried to calculate (actually guess) at the number of swarms cast from all commercial colonies in the US each season. I'm sure it varies each year but it must be a real high number even if the swarm percentage is low.  It's easy to speculate, although I have no data to support it, that commercial beekeeping by virtue of size, is likely a major source of unintentional mite bombs and therefore responsible for maintaining a reservoir of varroa that works against our efforts at control. 

It's a very unpopular topic because it offsets the allegations that it's usually neglectful hobby beekeepers that are the mite bomb makers. If we could look past the blame issue,  I think this area would benefit from some research especially if the research could focus on the implications of commercial swarms and how they are linked to varroa as a migratory parasite.  


Bill Hesbach
Cheshire CT

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2