BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 09:00:09 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
>  Commercial beekeepers all treated for mites and had the lowest loss. Treating for varroa cut losses almost in half.

You know, after I wrote this I thought "even that isn't something you can get from the data." 

Although it would appear to be true and validated by the numbers, the fact that commercial beekeepers had half the losses and always treated for varroa could be an indication of a different factor which doesn't appear in the numbers. They may be results rather than causes. 

The driver would more likely be: they are doing this for a living, they try harder and do more things to keep their numbers up.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2