BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sat, 18 Mar 2017 11:50:22 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
> But the difficulty I'm having is understanding if this study just identifies the natural paths that keep DWV circulating in the bee population or if the results suggest pathogenic infections can occur with these vectors. 

I think you have hit the nail on the head. They essentially proved that bees *could* get virus from stored honey and pollen, not that this is even an important route. In my opinion, sterilizing equipment may be a waste of time and money, if the primary vector for viruses is the bees, amplified by varroa parasitism. On the other hand, a real field trial comparison of bees on used equipment vs new, would be worthwhile; however, there are many confounding factors. 

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2