Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 4 Nov 1995 21:59:26 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jerry J Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]> raises an excellent point:
>Should your answer go to the whole list or just to the sender?
>Simple requests for basic information should go to the sender.
>...
>These questions are important to the requester, but do all 600+ of us
>need to see 5-20 answers to the same question?
All the other lists I read have Reply-To: point to the message
sender, not the whole list. Not only does it cut down inadvertant
broadcasts, but it's easier: personal reply, involving a unique
address, is automatic, while general list reply, which now requires
some effort, uses a fixed, easily-memorized address.
Sorry, Jerry; I thought this might rate consideration of the whole list. :)
My vote would be to point Reply-To: to the originator.
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|