Not true at all. Jeff Pettis published
this one a few years back, and it's been mentioned many
times
Did you look at the data in that report? You original post was in reference to 60%viability
Petis paper shos no classification as “failing” until below 50% as i read it.
Any links to whay historical viabilty is? There is always going to be a distribution curve. But it seems to me have no baseline?
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html