Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2017 13:35:36 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
> Randys Friend makes the sub, and its
> pretty good stuff, but not easy to find and procure yet.
>
Ah! Now I piece it together.
I've heard amazing things about his sub. But being on the other coast, and
not quite ready to buy it by the truckload, I have yet to try it out
myself. If it is as good as he says, I hope he finds a way to commercialize
on it (either producing it himself or licensing it out so others can
produce it in mass), in part because I would like to see the fruits of his
hard work pay off for him (assuming they haven't already), and in part
because I think it would be a significant improvement to the industry to
get that much nutrition to that many more bees.
To date, I have seen zero evidence in
> support of the hypothesis that photoperiod is a determining factor in
> colony buildup. On the other hand, I have seen considerable evidence to
> the contrary.
>
On a very cursory level, as I don't need you to take the time to get into
the specifics of it, what evidence have you seen to the contrary?
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|