Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:28:38 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Vandenberg AFB removed apiary locations after discovery of the federal endangered El Segundo Blue Butterfly on that base. The El Segundo Blue has a host plant relationship with coastal buckwheat and nectar feeding during its brief flight period.
>I am familiar with several National Park Service properties where a quiet policy of extermination of feral honeybee nests is conducted (with the "protecting native pollinators" rationale).
As was touched on earlier, the issue is the assumption that when we use a term we have a unified understanding of its use and that’s probably never the case. I assume that most reading John's post would not consider EHBs as invasive. But in this case, EHBs have been deemed harmful which would fit the broadly accepted definition- not native and cause harm. The harm part, or more importantly the degree of harm, is where categorizing an animal as invasive goes off the rails and gives rise to a continuum that allows for almost any definition and therefore any kind of action including, as with this case, misguided eradication.
Bill Hesbach
Cheshire CT
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|