BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date:
Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:39:11 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Robert Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
I don't want to speak for Michael, the OP, but we're close geographically, and I believe queen loss with MAQS is ALMOST as much a concern as cost. Perhaps it's our microclimate, or some other unknown factor, but here in Skagit and Whatcom counties of NW Washington, using MAQS at anything near the upper end of the day time recommended temperature range results in what some might consider unacceptable queen loss.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2