BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:39:39 -0600
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<025901d24996$035e00e0$0a1a02a0$@com>
Subject:
Re: Charles and Flumethrin
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
  I must assume that you did not attend the research lunch at CSBA where a major honey packer showed the residues of miticides and antibiotics in U.S.
honey, compared to those of other countries.  U.S. beekeepers have no reason to claim that their honey is the most pure.


We should also probably note for those who were not in attendance there were 4 major groups of contaminants that are being found in US honey. I believe the antibiotic issue was only one of those,  suspecting the other 3 were mite treatments?  You may have more info on that?

Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2