Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:48:04 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 14 July 2017 at 00:57, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> Re the Woodcock study, it is interesting to see the colony strengths PRIOR
> TO EXPOSURE to the neonics. In the UK groups, they mostly ranged from 1025
> to 2500 adult bees.
>
Randy
I have worked occasionally with a local bio-pesticide test Company here in
the UK. They are staffed exclusively with really well qualified people,
very knowledgeable about pesticides, test methodologies, regulations and
regulators, the literature on pesticides and about a wide range of insects
in general. HOWEVER individually and collectively they knew very little
about beekeeping practicalities.
I wonder if a similar issue may be acting among the authors and institutes
of this CEH paper? That might explain why they have not picked up that in
many cases they were using very small colonies, unrealistic of colonies
that will be placed to work on farmed crops.
Regards
Mike Rowbottom
Harrogate
UK
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|