BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:21:40 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Sulfoxaflor Registration "Revoked" - A Clumsy Strategy
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Bill T <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
 As the Chairman of the Bath Zoning Board of Appeals, I can see the easy
answer to this issue and it is "Grandfathered". The stuff that is still out
there still carries the label and therefore is grandfathered. The label
stands.

Everything else mentioned is trying to fit an unregistered pesticide and
the law concerning it to a once approved pesticide. It does not wash. They
are different animals.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine




<http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html>

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2