HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Laura Seifert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:21:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
hello everyone,
I use a version of South's functional artifact classification system pretty
much as a reflex. However, as I work on more late-1800s and early 1900s
sites, I find it increasingly unhelpful. I'm wondering what other artifact
cataloging systems everyone is using, especially for more modern sites. I
know DAACS is non-Southian and totally descriptive as opposed to
functional. A DAACS-type classification system (standardized,
non-functional) for later sites sounds like a great project, but when I
think about the amount and variety of material culture from the late
1800-1900s.... I want to crawl back in my test unit and hide. What do y'all
use?
Laura




Laura Seifert
Founder and Director
Savannah Archaeological Alliance
~ public archaeology through community partnerships ~
Get my book "Old Fort Jackson"
<https://www.arcadiapublishing.com/Products/9781467106122>
Pronouns: she/her/hers

########################################################################

Access the HISTARCH Home Page and Archives:
https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=HISTARCH

Unsubscribe from the HISTARCH List:
https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1

This email list is powered by LISTSERV:
https://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

########################################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2