BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:19:03 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: unmated queens
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Adam Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
I recall some discussion regarding this on Beesource.  Acceptance went down
as the virgin queen aged.  Acceptance was better for just emerged queens.
It was also better in mini mating nucs than in full size colonies.

Adam
Barrie, ON

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2