Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:03:17 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi all
I am skeptical that a decent substitute for pollen can be found or made, any more than there is a decent substitute for turkey and apple pie at Thanksgiving. To wit:
To have equated pollen with protein as effectively as had been done in the experiments
of Goetze and Bessling (1959) and Freudenstein (1960), recalls the
admonition of De Groot (1953): more is known of the foodstuffs than of the
nutritional requirements of bees. The fact that not a single pollen substitute
(chosen on the basis of its apparent protein value) gave the same result as bee-collected
pollen makes one wonder whether there is something more to pollen that still eludes us.
Hepburn, H. R., Pirk, C. W. W., & Duangphakdee, O. (2014). The Role of Pollen in Honeybee Colonies. In Honeybee Nests (pp. 145-173). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|