BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:32:04 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Good find Pete!

This study is open access at
http://stud.epsilon.slu.se/6985/1/goss_j_140707.pdf

This meticulous study deserves widespread citation, as it is exactly the
sort of field study needed to accurately assess the impacts of neonic seed
treatment upon honey bees.

My question is why it has not gotten widespread attention.  Many
universities give press releases of studies with sensational findings.  But
these findings were hardly sensational, but instead could be considered as
"negative results."  The problem in the neonic debate is that negative
results tend to get short shrift.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2