BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 01:14:28 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)


> On Aug 26, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 

>> And yet, very large apiaries have been common in the past and bees seemed to thrive in them, depending on environment, etc.

> 

> Define thrive!  Did they require large inputs of food and medication?



I was thinking specifically about apiaries of 500 or more hives in rural New York State a hundred years ago. There was enough clover and buckwheat to support that many hives in one location. Not generally fed, nor was there any medication to give them. As roads and transportation improved, people began dispersing their hives. 



But I am in support of Bailey’s contention that lowered density is healthier for bees. In fact, the large scale migration and feedlot style beekeeping seems like a dead end to me.



PLB







             ***********************************************

The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned

LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:

http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2