BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:12:16 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Brion Dunbar <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>But that's just for starters - if you go back the next day and follow the
>same process on the same colonies, you will get different numbers of mites

Yes but how different?  10-20% or order of magnitude?
Just for grins yesterday I did  alcohol wash samplings on 4 different colonies, from frame # 2, 4, 6. Results here(in percent):
hive #  
1       5.6   6.3   5.6
2       7.3   8      9.6
3       2      2.3    3
4      4.3    5.3    5

Not conclusive but gives me a bit of confidence that the sampling method itself works.
So do you think the sampling technique is bogus, or that the mites are 'clustered' in certain areas of the colony and move around from day to day?
             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2