BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Sulfoxaflor Registration "Revoked" - A Clumsy Strategy
From:
Bill T <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:12:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
I read the court opinion and could not find anything about allowing the
continued use of what was already sold and that you do not need to follow
the label directions since it is unregistered.

Lots of quotes but I could not locate them in the findings, including
taking phrases and trying to find them in the court document. In fact,
reasing the court document, it seems to put a halt on its use altogether.

So where did that come from (that you need not follow the label)?

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2