BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Jan 2015 08:22:15 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
65% of Alberta bee colonies are wintered outdoors. 20% of colonies are
wintered in southern British Colombia and 15% are wintered indoors.


This kind of information is exactly why the bee informed data is almost bad.
Here we have information that is defiantly right on the money and a key to
area losses, and yet not shown in the data.   How many of Ontario's bees are
wintered indoors?  OR NY?    Or the average area temp?  or snow fall (if you
look at bear mortality snowfall is a key.  More snow means bears winter
better,  guessing hives do also. (wind block)

Sometimes bad data is worse than no data.  As researchers they need to
continue to get a lot better at the collection techniques  and information,
or stop putting out information.  One other prominent researcher I know does
that also.   Big claim about how many pesticides were in hives  without
supporting data on how low the levels were and that the big majority thet
were tested were from only 2 different beekeepers.  Misleading, as is the
APHIS report.  
If the actively work from inputs of others to improve, then okay.

Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2