BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date:
Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:39:40 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Dick said:


"It makes zero difference if there is anything else present to compete for the binding site.  To be irreversible binding MUST be via covalent bonds, which would be highly unusual."


With all due respect, no.  I'm not a good chemist, Dick (meaning that's not my degree, and I have to think hard about chemistry), but I am a decent physiologist.  The conditions in the synapse preclude any useful degradation of the bond between the neonic and the receptor, because the binding coefficient of the neonic is so much greater than that of the native acetylcholinesterase that there is no contest.  That translates to "irreversible", given ambient conditions and lifespan of the bee.

Christina


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2