 
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2014 17:33:00 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> The rebuttal
> More rebuttal
Is there any need for more rebuttal than "a 135 ppb dose"?
Last time, people ENGAGED this pop-tart (no, a name brand is too good for
this level of work, let me correct myself - "Generic Toaster Pastry"), and
gave him room to weasel, and forums in which weasel and prance about.
Last time around the sole rebuttal of value was "400 ppb".
This time around, all one needs is "135 ppb".
The interesting question is: "Why didn't he kill his bees with the first few
feedings?"
I can offer no rational explanation, so all I can surmise is that they
screwed up, and fed a lower dose than they reported, at least during summer.
So, the evidence of hives that lived as long as they did seems clear proof
that they had no idea what dose they were administering.
It isn't even science. It is surrealism. Performance art.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|
