BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:47:13 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> >Could the levels fall below the 3.0 pbb and still have caused the kill?
>

I'm so sorry to hear, Anthony.   As I've detailed in some of my articles on
pesticides, when I've done the math on residue levels in dead bees vs LD50
values, they often don't come up high enough to clinch the case.  I
strongly suspect that we need to reevaluate LD50 values, especially in the
case of chronic exposure.

What I'd like to see is data for each pesticide in which a test crop was
sprayed to the point that there was observed bee kill at the entrances of
nearby hives.  Then take samples of those dead bees and allow them to sit
at ambient temperature.  Then take subsamples every day to determine the
measurable level of the a.i. in each sample.  Such data would help us
greatly in determining, after the fact, which pesticide actually caused the
kill.


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2