BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Apr 2016 07:45:45 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>
> >Also, very few experienced beekeepers test for it  yet routinely blame
> Nosema for causing diarrhea when they have not tested for it.
>

This is also a frustration of mine--that the "common knowledge" is that
dysentery equates to nosemosis.  That notion was highly questionable even
with N apis, and is completely unfounded  now that N ceranae has largely
displaced N apis.

This leads to anecdotal misinformation, such as when a survey asks: "In
your opinion, what factors were the most prominent cause (or causes) of
colony death," and then has a box for nosema, yet does not ask for
confirmation of diagnosis by microscopy.  Many respondents, seeing
dysentery, will likely incorrectly assume that if they saw dysentery, that
the colony died from nosema.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2