> Taken in this strong form, the precautionary principle
should be rejected, not because it leads in bad directions, but because it
leads in no direction at all.
Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Beyond the precautionary principle. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3), 1003-1058.
So is that not just one person's opinion? And does that opinion override 'legal systems all over the world'? ('The precautionary principle has been highly influential in legal systems all over the world.')
Best wishes
Peter
52°14'44.44"N, 1°50'35"W
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html