BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:24:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Hi all

Here's a puzzler for you. In the past few years, beekeepers have been claiming 30% winter losses, whereas 10% used to be considered high. I noticed a significant difference in the old recommendations: take your losses in fall. So, by culling in fall, winter losses are reduced. 

By not culling in fall, winter losses increase -- as a percentage of the fall number. Suppose you take the high summer number and the low spring number, which is better -- the old way or the new way? For example, suppose you cull 30% in the fall and get a 10% loss, versus cull 10% and then lose 30%. Which gives the most colonies in spring?

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2