BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:56:02 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Honey: constituent or ingredient?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
GAVIN RAMSAY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
>Back in 2011 when all this Court Circus started I got this information to
>the above question:


Nice poster  :-)

I'm glad to see that it is still available.  It is, of course, not the only description of transcontinental pollen movement in air masses.


Given the discussion we've had on whether or not beekeepers 'add' pollen to honey during extraction it is ironic that the hullabaloo all started with the beekeeper at the centre deliberately moving his bees closer to the GM trial site (from 2km to 500m), presumably in order that he could ensure 'adding' GM pollen to his honey for the purposes of campaigning on the issue.  I'm not sure that it would make much difference, but clearly he thought so.


http://www.dw.de/eu-beekeepers-stage-win-against-gm-crop-producers/a-14843153-1

Gavin

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2