Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:00:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi all
I often hear that "queens don't last as long as they used to." Here is advice from 1921:
It is getting to be more and more the practice on the part of the best producers in the country to requeen every year. Of course, where a queen has made a remarkably good record, she should be kept over for breeding purposes the following season, but men who are making crops by the five, ten, and fifty tons are finding it a good rule to _requeen at least once a year_.
While the practice is not universal among all the large producers, it is much more common than it once was. Formerly good bee-keepers believed that a colony needed requeening only once in two years; and in many localities with many beekeepers the practice was productive of good results. How much more honey could be secured by requeening every year cannot be told, but a queen more than a year old is liable to fail at a very inopportune time, perhaps causing a loss in earning power many times the cost of a new one.
E. R. Root (1920) The Importance of Requeening Often, Bee World, 2:12, 145-146, DOI: 10.1080/0005772X.1920.11094598
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|