BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Darrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Mar 2014 07:36:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
On 29-Mar-14, at 2:23 PM, James Fischer wrote:

>
>
> Further, each pesticide comes with promises about how it is NOT  
> persistent,
> and how it breaks down readily and quickly in sunlight and/or  
> water.  These
> claims would imply that no such detections could be made at  
> significant
> distances away from the use of the pesticides.
>

Christy Morrissey presented these results to the Ontario Beekeepers  
AGM in Nov 2013.  One result she expanded on there, that was only  
mentioned in the paper, was a test field that was planted once with  
seed treatment then left fallow(I believe) for four years. The  
chemical degraded only to 80% of original in those four years.  She  
was pointing out that soil types affect degradation rates.

Bob Darrell
Caledon Ontario
Canada
44N80W

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2