BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:25:20 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
GAVIN RAMSAY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> This is the protection that EU beekeepers want by requiring pollen to continue to be considered an ingredient. 

All I want to add to this debate is that in no way does the document Bil is referring to represent the majority of beekeepers in Europe.  There is absolutely no support from any mainstream beekeeping organisation in the country I'm writing this from, for example.  I mean the UK, not just Scotland.

Rather than celebrate the achievements of the campaigners, most beekeepers here just regard this way of thinking (and the European Court of Justice that supported it) as ... well .... plain wrong and just using beekeeping rather than supporting it.

Gavin


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2