BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Sep 2014 04:50:07 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Lu Again
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
From:
[log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 




http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/08/are-failing-bees-our-warning-sign/







  The report says nothing about what happened to the controls, those 

colonies treated in the same way, but free of neonicitinoids.  Is this 

poor reporting or did he conduct the experiment without controls for 

comparison?



Chris

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2