BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:40:06 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Hi Kevin

That's an interesting find. I always perk up my ears when Gene Robinson has something to say. One would reason that honey would be better for bees than cane sugar, and especially HFCS, but I never saw evidence of it. On the contrary, beekeepers have fed cane sugar for decades. HFCS, not so long. 

But this paper gives honey good marks. That's an incentive for leaving the bees' honey and not stripping them down, only to feed sugar. I feed sugar to stimulate buildup in spring but never in the fall to make up for harvesting too closely. Maybe honey syrup would make a better spring stimulant.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2