BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:55:23 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To:
<7A70CACE6A2C4071830179AB891D1F01@LionelPC>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
We've timed bees over 2 mile trip, 4 mile round trip.  They can cover a mile in less than 4 minutes.  What is a bigger factor than load is the orientation circling at hive before leaving and again in field before returning. to the hive.  For short distances, that behavior consumes a significant part of the time of the trip.  As we clocked bees over 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0  we found little difference in the trip times at the shorter distances, due to this orientation flight behavior , which was more or less a constant- the actual transect flight was relatively quick.    At longer distances, the orientation flight became a smaller part of the time of the trip.  Our surprise was that loaded or not didn't make much difference.  I assume that much of the differences in reports of speed of flight are due to the investigators failing to take into consideration the orientation part of the flight.  



             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2