BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:39:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
but please, someone show that  colonies pollinating seed treated
>>
> > canola are suffering?
>
> Will a 50% losses suffered some very good Alberta beekeepers serve the
> purpose?  The actual Provincial loss probably runs up near that number if
> weak colonies are considered dead.
>
> A non-sequitur.

The answer I am looking for involves those who actually are pollinating the
canola and whose bee losses can therefore be directly attributed to the
neonics.

It should be a very easy question to answer.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2