Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:23:31 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks Jerry for that long and very informative post.
By the way, I no longer see effects since soil injection stopped. In
addition to the dust problems I think soil injection around fruit trees and
for forestry applications is problematic.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> More recent work regarding lab vs real world pesticide studies
>
> Sublethal effects in higher-tier studies
>
>
> > Available higher-tier data (semi-field, field tests) should make any
> additional sublethal testing unnecessary, and higher-tier data should
> always override data of lower-tier trials on sublethal effects.
>
> -- Thompson, H. M., & Maus, C. (2007). The relevance of sublethal effects
> in honey bee testing for pesticide risk assessment. Pest Management
> Science,63(11), 1058-1061.
>
I would like to point out that Christian Maus is an employee of Bayer crop
science. His name is on tunnel studies of imidacloprid with R. Schmuck.
His inclusion on the EU panel developing guidelines for neonicotinoid
evaluation (7 pesticide company experts on a panel of 17) has not sat well
with many people.
http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/files/article/bees_final_layout.pdf
Most of the field tests are done by the companies so it is convenient if
they overide other data.
Stan
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|