HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:48:50 -0700
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
K.T.&K. mark
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<B6FF6ADA17234E80A9043CABD9E9B248@aaronpc>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Susan Walter <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
Hi,

Anyone aware of research done on K.T.&K. marks after deBolt 1994?

I have one with periods in the last line that he doesn't mention.
Are they significant?

Mine says:

K.T.&K.
----------
S------V
----------
CHINA
 S.F.L. 

And deBolt doesn't mention this particular series of letters (page 75).
It is on a Traymore pattern bowl (that pattern that was the copy of the Haviland Ranson).

Many thanks,
S. Walter

ATOM RSS1 RSS2