BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 07:59:35 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: decreased vitality in our bees
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<000301ce7622$8088aed0$819a0c70$@be>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Mike S <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
>>>   I'm trying to tell you that there is not one European beekeeper who believes
that bees are not thriving because of the absence of antibiotics.

I must be very dense.  There is a double negative in there - "not thriving" and "absence".  I'm trying to wrap my brain around those and having a difficult time of it.  Would it be safe to say that "bees are thriving because of the presence of antibiotics"?   Like I said, I'm having some comprehension problems here.  <GRIN>

Mike in LA


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2