Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:16:22 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Since I started this topic
a reply to several responders
mine is in bold lettering
James Fischer who wrote: I need only two words to completely address the
above - "irreversibe binding".
*I beg to differ since not all receptors have been permanently deactivated
nor can you do so regardless.*
Charles Linder wrote:
>While wanting to say its not the same, you first off miss the big picture
>of the study, which is that neonics themselves are not causing problems,
>AND the options are much worse.
>>Secondly, you still miss the issues that are huge problems, namely Varro
and PPB.
R*ight on Charles, just addressed an audience here in Ontario, and used
almost the same words including PPB.*
Bill Truesdell wrote:
Citation please.
*Agreed Bill, they're all smoke and no fire, lemmings!*
Ted Hancock wrote:
I agree with the suggestion that honey bees are low on the priority list of
today's farmers.
*Don't know where you get that from, Farmers here in Canada are fed up
with being bullied by the very ppb's that they let onto their properties to
make a living or have fun. The guys I work with are very much in tune
with their surroundings .*
N Wicker wrote:
Would you mind explaining what beekeeping practices you believe are
problematic (and why)? I am not trying to dispute, just clarify since I
wasn't
sure to what you were referring.
*Statement indicating a need for more experience and then it will become
self explanatory.*
Walter
littlewolfapiaries.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|