Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 31 Aug 2013 13:02:31 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Before starting here I politely contacted NOD with my observations and concerns. I have received no reply."
I want to acknowledge and thank Mr. VanderDussen of NOD for responding to my inquiry. Since his reply contains no personal or confidential information I hope that I am violating no trust by posting it here.
"I was quite concerned about the mite levels pre-treatment. As well as the phoretic mites, there are all the foundress mites under the brood caps, typically 70 to 80% of the varroa population. Even at 70%, the total mature female varroa load would be over 16,000 mites in some of the hives. A 95% control would still leave >800 fertile mites, 80% control would leave over 3,000. Of course fertile female mites can double the population about every 3 weeks, so a followup treatment would be required to have them below threshold and have a healthy population of young bees going into winter. Quite achievable with prompt action. Again I apologize for the slow response to your initial email."
I welcome comments and opinions about his analysis and recommendation. For me, this year the point is moot since I have already applied Apivar in all but one yard. The thought of another blast just as the colony brood is recovering is uncomfortable to me and frankly I am not willing to risk another failure at this late date. In fairness I will test at 21 and 42 days and post my Apivar results in the same colonies as the previous trial.
Randy, you have more "Cojones" than I. I admire your tenacity and hope you will keep us posted.
Paul Hosticka
Dayton WA
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|