BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:45:50 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<000601ce2b24$02be5c50$083b14f0$@be>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
GAVIN RAMSAY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> Two new studies:
So I suppose the question to ask this international and very well informed bee discussion group, is ...

Does anyone see any detectable level of depletion of the worker force, or any reluctance of colonies to forage, during and after Checkmite treatment, whether or not the bees might also be accessing neonic-treated crops?

For me, this smacks of research divorced from the reality of beekeeping, trying to tell us things that don't really happen in reality - at least not to any great extent.  But please correct me if I'm wrong.

Gavin


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2