BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:37:12 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: PF100s Three Years Later
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Mike S <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
>>>  Obviously a tighter, more condensed pattern (Case A) has more mass than the more spacious configuration (Case B).  So the answer to Mike's question is, Yes.

So how does the resistance (R factor) of heat transfer of the larger cell come into play for heat needs?  Since there should be more air within a larger cell than a smaller cell it would seem that the larger cell would be more resistant to heat changes verses the small cell.  More heat needed or less?  I don't know.  Just throwing  thoughts around.


Mike in LA


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2